Snopes Exposed Dont use snopes Do not use snopes! : Dr. Leonard Coldwell.com
banner ad

Snopes Exposed Dont use snopes Do not use snopes!

Snopes Exposed Don’t use snopes – Do not use snopes!

I might add they have reported to the Justice Department with regard to not telling the truth about aspartame, even after information was given that confirmed they were wrong.

<http://beforeitsnews.com/story/83/370/Snopes_Exposed.html>http://beforeitsnews.com/story/83/370/Snopes_Exposed.html

Snopes receives funding from an undisclosed source. The source is undisclosed because Snopes refuses to disclose that source. The Democratic Alliance, a funding channel for uber-Leftist (Marxist) Billionaires (George Soros etc.), direct funds to an “Internet Propaganda Arm” pushing these views. The Democratic Alliance has been reported to instruct Fundees to not disclose their funding source.

For the past few years <http://www.snopes.com/>www.snopes.com has positioned itself, or others have labeled it, as the ‘tell-all final word’ on any comment, claim and email. But for several years people tried to find out who exactly was behind <http://snopes.com>snopes.com. It is run by a husband and wife team – that’s right, no big office of investigators and researchers, no team of lawyers. It’s just a mom-and-pop operation that began as a hobby. David and Barbara Mikkelson in the San Fernando Valley of California started the website about 13 years ago and they have no formal background or experience in investigative research.
The reason for the questions – or skepticisms – is a result of <http://snopes.com>snopes.com claiming to have the bottom line facts to certain questions or issue when in fact they have been proven wrong. Also, there were criticisms the Mikkelsons were not really investigating and getting to the ‘true’ bottom of various issues.

A few months ago, when my State Farm agent Bud Gregg in Mandeville hoisted a political sign referencing Barack Obama and made a big splash across the Internet, ‘supposedly’ the Mikkelson’s claim to have researched this issue before posting their findings on <http://snopes.com>snopes.com. In their statement they claimed the corporate office of State Farm pressured Gregg into taking down the sign, when in fact nothing of the sort ‘ever’ took place. I personally contacted David Mikkelson (and he replied back to me) thinking he would want to get to the bottom of this and I gave him Bud Gregg’s contact phone numbers – and Bud was going to give him phone numbers to the big exec’s at State Farm in Illinois who would have been willing to speak with him about it. He never called Bud. In fact, I learned from Bud Gregg that no one from <http://snopes.com>snopes.com ever contacted anyone with State Farm.

Yet, <http://snopes.com>snopes.com issued a statement as the ‘final factual word’ on the issue as if they did all their homework and got to the bottom of things – not!

Then it has been learned the Mikkelson’s are very Democratic (party) and extremely liberal. As we all now know from this presidential election, liberals have a purpose agenda to discredit anything that appears to be conservative. There has been much criticism lately over the Internet with people pointing out the Mikkelson’s liberalism revealing itself in their website findings. Gee, what a shock?

So, I say this now to everyone who goes to <http://snopes.com>snopes.com to get what they think to be the bottom line fact ‘proceed with caution.’ Take what it says at face value and nothing more. Use it only to lead you to their references where you can link to and read the sources for yourself. Plus,you can always search a subject and do the research yourself.

I have found this to be true also! Many videos of Obama I tried to verify on Snopes and they said they were False. Then they gave their liberal slant! I have suspected some problems with snopes for some time now, but I have only caught them in half-truths. If there is any subjectivity they do an immediate full left rudder.

I have recently discovered that <http://Snopes.com>Snopes.com is owned by a flaming liberal and this man is in the tank for Obama. There are many things they have listed on their site as a hoax and yet you can go to You tube yourself and find the video of Obama actually saying these things. So you see, you cannot and should not trust <http://Snopes.com>Snopes.com, ever for anything that remotely resembles truth! I don’t even trust them to tell me if email chains are hoaxes anymore.

A few conservative speakers on MySpace told me <http://aboutSnopes.com>aboutSnopes.com. A few months ago and I took it upon myself to do a little research to find out if it was true. Well, I found out for myself that it is true. Anyway just FYI please don’t use <http://Snopes.com>Snopes.com anymore for fact checking and make your friends aware of their political leanings as well. Many people still <http://thinkSnopes.com>thinkSnopes.com is neutral and they can be trusted as factual. We need to make sure everyone is aware that that is a hoax in itself.

Thank you,
Alan Strong
Alan Strong CEO/Chairman
Commercial Programming Systems, Inc.
4400 Coldwater Canyon Ave. Suite
200 Studio City, CA. 91604-5039

Read more: <http://thehuffingtonriposte.blogspot.com/2010/05/snopes-exposed.html#ixzz0osKwmKIs>thehuffingtonriposte.blogspot.com/2010/05/snopes-exposed.html#ixzz0osKwmKIs

Be Sociable, Share!

Filed Under: AspartameDr. Coldwell Blog

Tags:

RSSComments (5)

Leave a Reply | Trackback URL

  1. Steve says:

    You mean Snopes isn’t run by a right wing “think tank” or any large affiliate of the Chamber of Commerce, and they keep exposing right wing propaganda claims? That proves it. They must be commies.

  2. Lol says:

    Lol, what a dumbass.

  3. Louie K says:

    I checked snopes.. this is totally fake.

  4. citogal says:

    First, I’d like to say that from what I’ve read, Alan Strong is a very interesting individual. He is a legitimate CEO of an IT Staffing company – a son of immigrants, self-made, a good handle on 3rd party consultants/contractors and the needs of businesses for IT personnel. As someone who works for a high-tech company that uses the services of 3rd parties to the tune of over $100 million per year, his insights in other articles/interviews are cogent and on-the-mark.

    Actually, this article makes me wonder if he wrote it, or if someone else is using his persona. The writer is relying too heavily on 2 anecdotal examples, and then degenerating language about how Snopes did not corroborate his Intel on videos of the POTUS. He makes a plea for Snopes readers to research things ourselves, and then he goes on to say that he found that conservative speakers don’t like Snopes, so that assures him that Snopes is “hard left.” This article started out well-written and then degenerated. It did not really read like the Alan Strong who uses eloquent dialogue when interviewed – the syntax and writing construction is off.

    In fact, I would say that the writers comments do have a highly conservative slant. For example, using the term “flaming liberal” is pejorative and not worthy of someone of his stature. Also, an extreme right-wing tactic is refusing to acknowledge that President Obama is, in fact, the POTUS by never using the term President. This seems to me to put him firmly in the conservative camp – at the very least, we need to respect the office of the POTUS.

    Perhaps this article would be more convincing if took out references to liberalism and the Democratic Alliance – which he cannot prove here – and just deal with the facts of the Snopes articles he finds incorrect. What are his arguments:

    1. Snopes said that Aspartame and Splenda/sucralose are safe. That doesn’t sound like a liberal agenda item – liberals are against artificial sweeteners and the big businesses that are shoving them in our faces or in our foods in the fine print. Snopes quotes USDA and independent research/white papers. Of course, those could be forged, how would we know?

    2. Snopes did not fact-check directly with State Farm. State Farm is not obligated to tell the truth about anything. I can’t imagine they would ever admit publicly to censorship. It’s better to get corroborating information from reliable 3rd parties, not the corporation that has a media machine and a vested interest to make themselves look good.

    3. When I have researched things myself, I generally find that Snopes is on-target. Just because an answer seems liberal doesn’t make it false. And just because an answer doesn’t please me, I don’t immediately assume it is a political conspiracy.

    My personal feeling here is that the writer – and I’m not convinced it is Mr. Strong – has an axe to grind, or someone is using his persona. Snopes is a resource at no cost. If people choose to use or not use, that is up to the individual.

    Perhaps Snopes can verify that this article was, in fact, written by Alan Strong?

Leave a Reply

The Dr Leonard Coldwell Foundation e V is responsible for the content of this website, all legal issues have to be addressed to Dr Leonard Coldwell Foundation e V Germany. Due to a hack on our sites we cannot retrieve the origin of some articles used on this website. We apologize for that. Articles are also from our friends, colleagues and fellow freedom fighters like: www.rense.com, www.seedsofdeception.com, www.goodlifefoundation.com, www.robertscottbell.com, www.healthfreedomusa.org www.dorway.com, www.prisonplanet.com, www.nvic.org, www.naturalnews.com and www.mercola.com. We appreciate the great work and research of Jeff Rense, Dr. Rima E. Laibow, Dr. Betty Martini, Dr. Thomas Hohn, Jeffrey Smith, Dr. Mercola, Mike Adams - The Health Ranger, Alex Jones, and others.