New Obama Birth Certificate is a Forgery
admin | Apr 28, 2011 | Comments 4
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
April 28, 2011
Our investigation of the purported Obama birth certificate released by Hawaiian authorities today reveals the document is a shoddily contrived hoax. Infowars.com computer specialists dismissed the document as a fraud soon after examining it.
Check out the document released by WhiteHouse.gov for yourself.
Upon first inspection, the document appears to be a photocopy taken from state records and printed on official green paper. However, when the government released PDF is taken into the image editing program Adobe Illustrator, we discover a number of separate elements that reveal the document is not a single scan on paper, as one might surmise. Elements are placed in layers or editing boxes over the scan and green textured paper, which is to say the least unusual.
When sections of the document are enlarged significantly, we discover glaring inconsistencies. For instance, it appears the date stamped on the document has been altered. Moreover, the document contains text, numbers, and lines with suspicious white borders indicating these items were pasted from the original scan and dropped over a background image of green paper.
VIDEO: Alex Jones gives proof that Obamas purported birth certificate is fraud.
Lets assume the state of Hawaii scanned the original document and placed it on the green textured background. This does not explain the broken out or separate elements. There is no logical reason for this to be done unless the government planned to modify the document and make it appear to be something other than it is.
There are two elements of interest, as shown in the image to the above both entries for the date accepted by the local registry. This appears to have been modified in an image editing program.
The media was quick to dispel the fact the document was modified. Our analysis of the latest controversy: The original birth certificate was probably in a €˜negative form, and someone at the White House took it upon themselves to doctor it up so the form can be readable, writes Joe Brooks for Wireupdate.
Nathan Goulding, writing for the National Review, tells us anybody can open the White House released PDF in Illustrator and it will break out into layers. Ive confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home, he writes.
Indeed, but this does not answer the question why in the Obama birth certificate PDF the layers or elements contain dates which appear to be modified and the signature of the state registrar. If the document was acquired from state records in whole, why was it necessary to add elements? Goulding and Brooks do not address this issue.
These layers are also revealed by the White House issued PDFs hex file in freeware hex editor
. Within its code are listed 8 image masks, which if changed from value true to false turn off and on to reveal the layers as demonstrated in the video and in Illustrator. Whether these represent compression artifacts or other digitizing processes, or whether these masks represent deliberate manipulation remains to be conclusively shown.
As Market-Ticker.org points out, it may prove to be significant that two of the boxes appear over both of the date accepted boxes, as well as the Mothers occupation box. Was there a need to tamper with the dates on the document or other areas? The recent stamp date and issuing signature of the state registrar also contain an edited layer.Questions have also been raised about the number at the top of the document issued by the Department of Health, number 61 10641, as one part of the number is in a separate layer when viewed in Illustrator, as demonstrated in the video above. This may prove to be significant. A long form birth certificate obtained by the Honolulu Star in 2009 from a female born one day after Obama and whose form was accepted three days after Obamas document contains a Dept. of Health number that is lower, 61 10637. There are other subtle differences, such as the use of Aug. for the date rather than August, and the use of Honolulu, Oahu rather than Honolulu, Hawaii (seen also in the 1962 certificate below) which may or may not be significant.
More to the point, this certificate and others, like the one posted below it, have visible seals. No issuing seal can be seen on the document released today by Obama.
Negative of long form birth certificate for Aug. 5, 1961 birth in Honolulu, released in 1966 with seal and dated signatures.Published by Honolulu Star and World Net Daily in 2009.
Photo of physical copy of long form birth certificate for June 15, 1962 birth in Honolulu, also with visible seal.
Infowars will continue to analyze this issue as more information comes in. It is significant that the Obama Administration was pressured into responding to this controversy, whatever the final analysis of this document. However, the administration still needs to release his other records which have been sealed at great expense. Is there an issue with his being naturalized in Indonesia? Why are his college records at Columbia and Occidental sealed, and what do they contain? Did Obama travel to Pakistan on a foreign passport? These questions and many others have not been properly answered.
Filed Under: Dr. Coldwell Blog
Facebook
Youtube
Twitter
RSS
Obama Birth Certificate is a fake
President Obama has release a Adobe Illustrator of a Certificate of live birth. I have examined the document and a documents of the Nordyke twins girls birth certificate numbers are 61 10637 and 61 10638 are black back ground with white lettering. Obama’s certificate of live birth is on green paper with a number 61 10641.
Why is there no records for Dunham having been a patient at Kapi’olani in 1961, or of Obama having been born at the hospital on Aug. 4, 1961, or have been released by the hospital?
“This is so maddening to listen to the media on this recent revelation… it’s such an obvious fake. look at the marks on this Internet version and you can see this was the template for Obama’s BC handiwork. The handwriting is exactly the same between posted Internet image and Obama’s fake version — the placement of boxes and marks are in the exact same position, dates are where the modified clipping masks occur to adjust dates to fit for Obama, but the handwriting of dates match (except for the clipping mask changes). Even the Cert. number is only off by the last two digits (which…you guessed it… happens to be a clipping mask layer).†Mara Z. :
“I have been using Adobe Illustrator since the original version (Illustrator 88) came out in 1988.
I have attached a few Illustrator files that I believe will provide evidence that I am indeed an illustrator expert. I can send out the original files if you wish.
The comments made by Mara Z are very interesting. The first question is – what was the source of this pdf file? If the pdf file came from Obama’s people, the claims that this document was “doctored†may indeed be of merit. The first question is, why are there any layers on this document at all? It was clearly created in Photoshop, which is always used for image processing.
The second question is, if you look at the file I have sent as Obama Certificate Actions 01, you can see in the actions palette that there were 24 actions performed on this file before it was made into a pdf. Many of the actions are not Illustrator functions, but are Photoshop actions. Thus, this file was created in Photoshop, and exported as Photoshop 5 (why, that’s a very old version?) and it was next saved for the web (a Photoshop action) three times.
Again, first, we need to ascertain where this file came from.†John G.
I allege that fake Certificate of live birth is a violation of Title 18, section 1001. The President could have committee a criminal offense. The individuals helping Obama with faking the birth certificate is a violation of Title 18, section 371. His statements “I was born in Hawaii ” could be a violation of Title 18, section 1001.
The Hawaii Revised Statute 338-178 allows registration of birth in Hawaii for a child that was born outside of Hawaii to parents who, for a year preceding the child’s birth, claimed Hawaii as their place of residence.
Why hasn’t Snopes commented on any of this lately??? Have their ‘experts’ checked anything out??
The document lists the President’s father’s birthplace as Kenya. But Kenya didn’t officially become Kenya until December 12, 1963. The President was born in 1961. Would his birth certificate list a country that wasn’t officially a country? You can see the date that Kenya became a country in the right hand column in this Wikipedia entry:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya
Before that date, the land was officially British East Africa Protectorate, or simply British East Africa:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Africa_Protectorate
It was also referred to as Kenya Colony, or the Protectorate of Kenya:
On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is “Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital”. If you want to know more about that hospital, here is a page on its website that describes its background:
http://www.kapiolani.org/women-and-children/about-us/default.aspx
Notice that Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital, which is the hospital in question that is listed on the President’s birth certificate, didn’t even exist in 1961. It didn’t come into existence until 1978. Before then, there were two hospitals, Kauikeolani Children’s Hospital and Kapi‘olani Maternity Home.
The hospital’s OWN WEBSITE says that those two hospitals merged in 1978 to become the one single hospital that is listed on the document the White House released as being the official birth certificate.
How in the world, in 1961, could anyone have known that 17 years later, a merger between two hospitals was going to happen, and list the yet-to-be-formed hospital on the President’s birth certificate?